Evaluation of Selected Finite-Difference and Finite-Volume Approaches to Rotational Shallow-Water Flow

Communications in Computational Physics
Vol. 27 No. 4 (2020), pp. 1234-1274
Preview Buy Article · USD $20 Full text requires purchase or subscription
Author(s)
, , , ,
1 SINTEF Digital,Mathematics&Cybernetics, P.O.Box124Blindern, NO-0314 Oslo, Norway.
2 SINTEF Digital Math & Cybernet, POB 124 Blindern, NO-0314 Oslo, Norway
3 Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Math, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway
4 Oslo Metropolitan Univ, Dept Comp Sci, POB 4 St Olays Plass, NO-0130 Oslo, Norway
5 Norwegian Meteorological Institute, P.O. Box 43 Blindern, NO-0313 Oslo, Norway.
6 Norwegian Meteorol Inst, POB 43 Blindern, NO-0313 Oslo, Norway
7 Univ Gothenburg, Dept Marine Sci, POB 461, SE-40530 Gothenburg, Sweden
8 Univ Oslo, Dept Geosci, POB 1047 Blindern, NO-0316 Oslo, Norway
Received
February 28, 2019
Accepted
May 24, 2019
Abstract

The shallow-water equations in a rotating frame of reference are important for capturing geophysical flows in the ocean. In this paper, we examine and compare two traditional finite-difference schemes and two modern finite-volume schemes for simulating these equations. We evaluate how well they capture the relevant physics for problems such as storm surge and drift trajectory modelling, and the schemes are put through a set of six test cases. The results are presented in a systematic manner through several tables, and we compare the qualitative and quantitative performance from a cost-benefit perspective. Of the four schemes, one of the traditional finite-difference schemes performs best in cases dominated by geostrophic balance, and one of the modern finite-volume schemes is superior for capturing gravity-driven motion. The traditional finite-difference schemes are significantly faster computationally than the modern finite-volume schemes.

Stay updated
Share
How to Cite