Phase Field Models Versus Parametric Front Tracking Methods: Are They Accurate and Computationally Efficient?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4208/cicp.190313.010813aAbstract
We critically compare the practicality and accuracy of numerical approximations of phase field models and sharp interface models of solidification. Here we focus on Stefan problems, and their quasi-static variants, with applications to crystal growth. New approaches with a high mesh quality for the parametric approximations of the resulting free boundary problems and new stable discretizations of the anisotropic phase field system are taken into account in a comparison involving benchmark problems based on exact solutions of the free boundary problem.
Downloads
Published
2018-03-27
Abstract View
- 40136
Pdf View
- 4030
Issue
Section
Articles
How to Cite
Phase Field Models Versus Parametric Front Tracking Methods: Are They Accurate and Computationally Efficient?. (2018). Communications in Computational Physics, 15(2), 506-555. https://doi.org/10.4208/cicp.190313.010813a