Evaluation of Selected Finite-Difference and Finite-Volume Approaches to Rotational Shallow-Water Flow

Authors

  • Håvard H. Holm SINTEF Digital,Mathematics&Cybernetics, P.O.Box124Blindern, NO-0314 Oslo, Norway.
  • André R. Brodtkorb SINTEF Digital,Mathematics&Cybernetics, P.O.Box124Blindern, NO-0314 Oslo, Norway.
  • Göran Broström Norwegian Meteorological Institute, P.O. Box 43 Blindern, NO-0313 Oslo, Norway.
  • Kai H. Christensen Norwegian Meteorological Institute, P.O. Box 43 Blindern, NO-0313 Oslo, Norway.
  • Martin L. Sætra Norwegian Meteorological Institute, P.O. Box 43 Blindern, NO-0313 Oslo, Norway.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4208/cicp.OA-2019-0033

Keywords:

Rotational shallow-water simulations, storm surge modelling, hyperbolic conservation laws, high-resolution finite-volume methods, test cases, verification.

Abstract

The shallow-water equations in a rotating frame of reference are important for capturing geophysical flows in the ocean. In this paper, we examine and compare two traditional finite-difference schemes and two modern finite-volume schemes for simulating these equations. We evaluate how well they capture the relevant physics for problems such as storm surge and drift trajectory modelling, and the schemes are put through a set of six test cases. The results are presented in a systematic manner through several tables, and we compare the qualitative and quantitative performance from a cost-benefit perspective. Of the four schemes, one of the traditional finite-difference schemes performs best in cases dominated by geostrophic balance, and one of the modern finite-volume schemes is superior for capturing gravity-driven motion. The traditional finite-difference schemes are significantly faster computationally than the modern finite-volume schemes.

Published

2020-02-23

Abstract View

  • 47318

Pdf View

  • 3073

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Evaluation of Selected Finite-Difference and Finite-Volume Approaches to Rotational Shallow-Water Flow. (2020). Communications in Computational Physics, 27(4), 1234-1274. https://doi.org/10.4208/cicp.OA-2019-0033